The emerging government mantra for COVID suppression appears to be personal responsibility. Gone are the days of broad mandates and harsh restrictions.
Victorians are now “strongly encouraged” to do the right thing themselves: mask up, use a RAT when you’re unwell and stay home if you feel sick or test positive.
Premier Daniel Andrews speaks on Sunday.Credit:Luis Ascui
All fine in theory. But personal responsibility has limits.
Firstly, it only works if people do actually exercise their personal responsibility to protect themselves, their loved ones and those in their community.
You only have to step onto a train to see that in the limited spaces where masks are still mandated, many people are ignoring the very rules designed to protect them and those around them.
You’d think with almost 10,000 new COVID cases and 16 deaths in Victoria on Sunday alone, people might think a bit more carefully about their personal responsibility.
Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas.Credit:Joe Armao
But secondly, and perhaps most crucially, personal responsibility only works if you have the personal means do what’s required.
Basic economics apply: you can’t buy masks or self-fund your COVID tests without money.
If recent history is any guide then increased demand, panic buying and price gouging will also inevitably lead to product shortages and price spikes.
Those with the available means will be outraged. But they will eventually shrug, mutter “Well, that’s annoying” and buy the necessary materials anyway.
Basic economics apply: you can’t buy masks or self-fund your COVID tests without money.Credit:Justin McManus
But those with less money won’t fare so well.
They will be forced to navigate the world without the protection of a mask and regular RAT testing, or make heart-breaking sacrifices to afford these items. These may include skipping meals, not using electricity, missing necessary medication or not paying bills, further compounding other challenges in their lives.
People who are both poor and immunosuppressed, or medically vulnerable in some other way, may “choose” to stay home entirely, entering into a form of endless personal lockdown.
These scenarios are all utterly unacceptable.
Your income and your postcode should not determine your health, the health of your loved ones and your local community.
A high-level public campaign to encourage more people to get a COVID booster also presents challenges. Simply asking people to get their jab isn’t good enough.
Broad campaigns don’t reach everybody, and not everybody has the financial or practical means to get immunised. This is especially true for disadvantaged, multicultural or geographically isolated communities.
Intensive community outreach, genuine engagement with community organisations and local leaders, and tailored communications efforts are critical to increasing vaccine uptake.
The Victorian government knows this, because it did an admirable job throughout 2021 as vaccine supplies finally rolled out. This effort must be sustained.
(National cabinet’s recent decision – after a week of near universal condemnation – to continue support payments for casual workers is a welcome counterpoint to the broader trend to personal responsibility.)
If Victoria is to make this shift successfully, the needs of vulnerable people and the community organisations that support them must not be an afterthought.
They must be front and centre.
As an example, the Victorian government has announced new cash grants for businesses to improve air quality in their premises. This makes sense, as nobody wants to shop, dine or work in a stuffy, unventilated environment.
But community sector organisations – like family violence refuges, homelessness support centres, community legal centres – aren’t eligible for these grants.
This is a particularly alarming omission given the people who frequent these settings often live with other forms of vulnerability, such as a health condition or a disability.
Nobody knows when this COVID rollercoaster will end, only that it’s not over yet.
For so long as COVID remains a threat, we must ensure the views and the needs of people with less or with existing precarious health are given the highest prominence.
The alternative is unthinkable. A two-track recovery, where those who can afford it live a life of relative safety and freedom, while everybody else endures a lower quality of life, punctuated by isolation and illness.
Nobody wants that.
Most Viewed in National
From our partners
Source: Read Full Article