Vegan woman, 73, who refused to deal with mouse infestation at her home because the vermin were ‘her pets’ and ‘wouldn’t go to her neighbours because she looked after them’ is fined £1,500
- Margaret Manzoni, of St Osyth, Essex, was fined by Tendring District Council
- Hearing took place at Colchester Magistrates’ Court this month
- Manzoni was told the impact on neighbours meant inaction was not appropriate
- Court awarded council costs of £2,395 and imposed a victim surcharge of £150
A vegan who failed to deal with a mouse infestation at her mid-terrace home because the rodents were ‘her pets’ has been fined £1,500 by a court.
Tendring District Council said 73-year-old Margaret Manzoni, of St Osyth in Essex, believed the mice ‘would not go to her neighbours because she looked after them’.
The authority prosecuted the pensioner for a second time after she did not comply with a previous order made in April.
At a hearing at Colchester Magistrates’ Court this month, Manzoni was told that while the court ‘respected her beliefs as an ethical vegan, others saw mice as vermin’, the council said.
The court said that the ‘impact of the infestation on neighbours meant inaction was not appropriate’, according to the authority.
A vegan who failed to deal with a mouse infestation at her mid-terrace home in St Osyth, Essex, claiming that taking action would go against her ethical beliefs, has been fined by a court. Above: A mouse is pictured in a neighbour’s home
Tendring District Council said 73-year-old Margaret Manzoni ‘considered the mice her pets’ and ‘said they would not go to her neighbours because she looked after them’. Above: The vegan’s home (centre)
Manzoni admitted at the hearing on October 6 to charges of failing to comply with a notice under the Environmental Protection Act and a notice under the Prevention of Damage by Pests Act.
Along with the £1,500 fine, the court awarded the council costs of £2,395 and imposed a victim surcharge of £150.
In setting the fine magistrates took into account Manzoni’s personal situation, and highlighted that clearance work would also need to be paid for.
The court heard that the council’s environmental health team was called in by neighbouring residents who were over-run by mice, causing property damage, due to conditions at Manzoni’s mid-terrace home, the council said.
The authority prosecuted the pensioner for a second time after she did not comply with a previous order made in April. Above: The mouse in a neighbour’s boot
At a hearing at Colchester Magistrates’ Court this month, Manzoni was told that while the court ‘respected her beliefs as an ethical vegan, others saw mice as vermin’, the council said. Above: One of the mice in a neighbour’s house
Council staff made several visits and offered help, before issuing notices ‘ordering Manzoni to stop feeding birds, to clear the overgrown garden, and call in pest control’, the authority said.
‘While some building works were carried out by the council, food and shelter continued to be provided by Manzoni for the mice – leading to an overpowering smell and which forced neighbours to move out,’ a spokesman for Tendring District Council said.
‘Tendring District Council offered Manzoni alternative accommodation but, she considered the mice her pets, said they would not go to her neighbours because she looked after them, and refused to take action stating it went against her ‘ethical beliefs’.
Manzoni admitted at the hearing on October 6 to charges of failing to comply with a notice under the Environmental Protection Act and a notice under the Prevention of Damage by Pests Act. Above: A dead mouse is seen on the floor of the home
‘This led to the first prosecution, since which despite continued regular visits by the environmental health team nothing has changed; leaving the council no choice but to prosecute again.’
Michael Talbot, Tendring District Council cabinet member for environment, said the prosecution was ‘a real last resort’ but that ‘despite repeated visits, offers of help, legal notices, and the previous court action, nothing has been done by the property owner’.
He continued: ‘We respect people’s personal beliefs and how they choose to live in their homes, but when this has a detrimental impact on others then we have no choice but to take the necessary steps to ensure everyone’s quality of life.’
Source: Read Full Article