Jury in R. Kelly's child porn trial enter second day of deliberations

Jury in R. Kelly’s child porn trial enter second day of deliberations

  • Prosecutor told jurors to remember the girls and women Kelly allegedly abused 
  • Kelly, 55, was sentenced to 30 years in prison during a separate trial in June
  • He faces four counts of producing child porn and five of enticing minors for sex
  • The musician and his co-defendant are also accused of fixing Kelly’s 2008 trial 

Jurors were set to begin deliberating for a second day Wednesday at R. Kelly’s federal trial in Chicago, sorting through a month of evidence and arguments on charges accusing the singer of producing child pornography, enticing minors for sex and rigging his 2008 child porn trial.

The jurors must consider 13 separate counts, some involving complex law and assessments of which witnesses were more believable.

They began deliberating Tuesday after Judge Harry Leinenweber gave them jury instructions, including explicit descriptions of what constitutes sexual abuse.

Before they withdrew Tuesday, Kelly attorney Jennifer Bonjean sounded indignant, likening government testimony and evidence to a cockroach and the government’s case to a bowl of soup.

If a cockroach falls into soup, she said, ‘you don’t just pull out the cockroach and eat the rest of the soup. You throw out the whole soup,’ said told jurors. She said of the prosecution’s case: ‘There are just too many cockroaches.’

The 55-year-old R&B singer is already serving a 30-year prison sentence after he was found guilty last year in New York City on charges of federal racketeering and sex trafficking.

R. Kelly is pictured leaving the Daley Center after a hearing in his child support case on May 8, 2019, in Chicago. Kelly and two co-defendants are facing federal charges of trial-fixing, child pornography and enticing minors for sex on the second day of the trial

In her rebuttal Tuesday, prosecutor Jeannice Appenteng told jurors to remember the girls and women Kelly allegedly abused.

‘When you are in the quiet of the jury room, consider the evidence in light of who is at the center of this case. Kelly’s victims: Jane, Nia, Pauline, Tracy and Brittany,’ Appenteng said, referring to five Kelly accusers named in charging documents by their pseudonyms or first names.

She said as Kelly’s fame boomed in the mid-1990s, his inner circle increasingly geared everything they did to what Kelly wanted.

‘And ladies and gentlemen, what R. Kelly wanted was to have sex with young girls,’ she said.

Bonjean described Kelly as a flawed genius who has been functional illiterate since childhood and was ill-equipped to navigate his celebrity and expanding wealth. She said having been abused as a child also deeply affected him.

Known for his smash hit ‘I Believe I Can Fly’ and for sex-infused songs such as ‘Bump n’ Grind’, Kelly sold millions of albums even after allegations of sexual misconduct circulated in the 1990s.

Widespread outrage emerged after the #MeToo reckoning and the 2019 Lifetime docuseries ‘Surviving R. Kelly.’

Serving sentence: The 55-year-old R&B singer, shown in May 2019 in Chicago, is already serving a 30-year prison sentence after he was found guilty last year in New York City on charges of federal racketeering and sex trafficking

The musician and his co-defendant Derrell McDavid, Kelly’s ex-business manager, are accused of fixing Kelly’s 2008 trial on state child porn charges by intimidating and paying off witnesses.

Kelly faces four counts of producing child porn, one of conspiring to obstruct justice by fixing the 2008 trial, one of conspiring to receive child porn, two of actually receiving it and five of enticing minors for sex.

McDavid is charged with four counts — two for receiving child porn, one for conspiring to do so and one for conspiring to obstruct justice by rigging the 2008 trial, at which Kelly was acquitted.

Co-defendant Milton Brown, a former Kelly associate, faces a single count of conspiring to receive child pornography.

The second day of the trial comes after a juror suffered a panic attack on Monday while hearing graphic closing arguments in the case.

The white woman who works for a public library said she couldn’t bear to hear ‘one minute more’ and was excused by the judge at Dirksen Courthouse in Chicago. 

Judge Leinenweber replaced Juror number 44 with Juror 83, a white man.

The switch came after Assistant US Attorney Elizabeth Pozolo and a defense attorney had presented closing arguments, with the trial continuing after the swap was made.

Kelly, who has denied the current charges, was acquitted in the 2008 case after a key witness refused to testify at the trial.

Jurors at the time said that made it difficult for them to convict Kelly.

Source: Read Full Article